Sunday, May 31, 2020

Inertia at rest

How are we gearing up for post-COVID-19? In case we’ve forgotten, given this longish lockdown, we’re the regional laggard with a poverty rate that should have jolted us from our stupor decades ago.

But will inertia play itself out? Enter: Google. Inertia – the tendency of a body at rest to remain at rest or of a body in straight line motion to stay in “motion” in a straight line unless acted on by an outside force; the resistance of a “body” to changes in momentum; “resistance” or disinclination to motion, action, or change: an entrenched bureaucracy’s inertia, for example.

Let’s reprise why we’re the regional laggard and start with these poverty-rate numbers: Thailand = 7.20%; Vietnam = 8.00%; Malaysia = 3.80%; Indonesia = 10.90%; Philippines = 21.60%.

Question: How can these neighbors so embarrass us? Try exports (US$ billion): Thailand = 245.3; Vietnam = 304.3; Malaysia = 238.1; Indonesia = 183.5; Philippines = 70.3.

But what is on our mind? Consider: “When I would write and advocate about the need to protect local industries to preserve local jobs, others said that I was still advocating protectionism and economic nationalism. These concepts were supposedly anti-business and obsolete in this globalized world.

“I would argue that this ‘trickle-down’ theory did not work, and business was losing jobs in our economy. That was the time when the overseas workers became ‘heroes.’ My question then was, why were jobs being created abroad and not here in the Philippines?” [The end of globalization, Elfren S. Cruz, BREAKTHROUGH, The Philippine Star, 24th May 2020]

Jobs are not magically created, with due respect to Elfren. But he can’t be alone. So, let’s drill it down.

Have we forgotten that we’re stuck as a service-consumption economy? Why? We once assumed that the OFW phenomenon was a stopgap measure, yet we never lifted a finger – then embraced the “Dutch disease.” 

For example, where is Arangkada? Why aren’t we actively debating it? It is one of the very few times industrialization started a national conversation!

On the other hand, our neighbors, starting with the Asian Tigers, were smart enough to recognize the imperative to industrialize and beg for Western money and technology. That’s why jobs were created abroad and not here in the Philippines.

Benchmark. Benchmark. Benchmark.

Question: Why don’t we benchmark? Consider: We, especially in the elite class, assumed that we couldn’t be Singapore because Lee Kuan Yew was an autocrat. Ditto for Mahathir. But wasn’t Marcos a dictator?

These three leaders or autocrats had their infrastructure development and industrialization initiatives. But only Marcos did not deliver to take us from the third world to the first world.

Why?

Given our caste system, hubris has infected us. Our servants and subordinates can do our bidding, but that won’t suffice to elevate us to an industrialized economy. We cannot even provide Juan de la Cruz with “water and electricity.”

There is a hierarchy of human needs that we can’t take for granted – and expect to progress as a nation and develop an innovation culture and be a globally competitive economy.

We don’t call it hubris; we call it compassion, i.e., preserving jobs, so we’re stuck with the jeepney instead of thinking forward and developing an efficient public transportation system – which can’t be a priority in a two-car garage world. [In fairness, there is a modernization plan in the works triggered by the pandemic, per Andrew J. Masigan’s recent column.] 

Do we then want to conflate our problems with the US, i.e., that even the US suffers from globalization? But we are not in the same league that we chose to kick out the US military?

Greed was the cause of the 2008 Global Recession, and the US hasn’t fully restored the wherewithal of its economy. And that was driven by its financial services sector with a little help from European bankers.

And not to forget, the universe never stops being a 24/7 dynamic phenomenon. For instance, the coal industry is declining, while shale oil and natural gas are rising. Trump can make empty promises to coal miners, but that is that empty.

What about Brexit and the populism we see in a handful of Central and Eastern European countries? The UK represents the classic island mentality. That’s an easy one. And like the US, it is polarized – and why to this day it struggles to define itself.

While in a few former Soviet satellite countries, a bit of commissar mentality remains, and so Putin has a ready client base. On the other hand, as the world sees in Ukraine, these people would instead run to America, no different from Vietnam, running away from China to America.

People understand what freedom is. The writer and wife keep a home in the heart of Eastern Europe, and local friends haven’t stopped educating them on what freedom means to them.

In the meantime, given all its wealth, we can’t commiserate that the US is behind the curve. Did the world pity the UK when the US overtook them despite their lead in the industrial revolution? And this is not the first time the US confronts a big-sized challenge.

The writer represented corporate America during the heyday of Japan Inc., and even in the Philippines, we felt it because American companies had to embark on massive restructuring efforts to survive the Japanese manufacturing and quality prowess.

In other words, America is a big boy and must respond to all comers, good and bad, like a good sport: “Bring them on!” It claims “American exceptionalism” for a reason. And why Trump represents the minority, not the majority view.

The moral of the story: Toss the fixed mindset, and develop a growth mindset, a recurring theme of the blog.

Those familiar with the blog would remember that until we stand face-to-face with our instincts – from parochialism to why we are a culture of impunity – and resolve to step up to the plate, we won’t develop a growth mindset. Nor forward-thinking. Or to recognize the story of creation and the dynamism of the universe. 

Consider: Humankind did not go extinct after the banishment from Eden nor after two World Wars and several plagues and pandemics. Sadly, in the Philippines, because of our caste system, Padre Damaso lives on. Unsurprisingly, we are the regional laggard!

And for the quants, neither would we develop analytics skills no matter how good we are in analyzing because analytics demands forward-thinking. It cannot be driven by technology like SAP alone, for example. 

How many companies in the Philippines have SAP? Yet, our most significant companies – combined – can’t even match Samsung Vietnam in income generation. In other words, until we learn to forward-think, we are not ready for the big league. And we will continue to pay the price. See above how our neighbors embarrass us, as in our alarming poverty rate.

Technology helps, but even with AI, human intervention won’t cease. There will be a need for fewer bean counters, but AI is not into metacognition yet. It may get there but not tomorrow. That is why it is taking so long to develop a vaccine for COVID-19 despite the advent of quantum computers. They are supposed to do some of these chores at warp speed.

But let’s get back to China. As the blog has argued, it was our shortsightedness that made us kick out the US military. China remains an autocracy, and that we should have known that in making friends, we cannot project our self-image, i.e., we love tyranny because we value hierarchy and paternalism – aka a caste system.

On the other hand, we assumed we should forever be beholden to our once colonizer, the US. What did we miss? That humans develop. That the US and Juan de la Cruz will move up in human development and servitude is not cast in stone.

For the sake of argument, let’s grant that once upon a time, America had an expansionist agenda, i.e., they deliberately took a big chunk of North America, including Puerto Rico in the Caribbean.

But can we imagine a reality where the US military will take over any island or territory of the Philippines in this 21st century? For future reference, we better learn how to figure out how to define who are friends must be. But we know that in the case of Japan. 

In other words, permanence is not of this world – nor is perfection. On the other hand, absolutism is hubris, as in Padre Damaso.

Globalization is not perfect. Neither is capitalism or socialism.

The universe we live in isn’t about any isms but dynamism.

Simply put, to overcome the shortcomings of globalization, we must learn dynamism.

Let’s pretend that from tomorrow the nations of the world will shut themselves out to the rest of the world.

Consider: OFW remittances bring in $34 billion, and if we add the BPO revenues, we are talking $60 billion. Who will cover for these income streams, the two drivers of the Philippine economy?

But that’s not all: “PH is world’s biggest rice importer for 2019,” Karl R. Ocampo, Philippine Daily Inquirer, 12th Nov 2019.

“A report by the United States’ Department of Agriculture-Foreign Agricultural Services (USDA-FAS) has projected the country’s rice imports to reach a record three million metric tons (MT) by year-end—the highest in the world and the highest for the country.

"This tops the current biggest importer of rice, China. With a population of 1.4 billion, the Asian nation expects to import 2.5 million MT of rice this year. Last month, the two countries tied at the top spot with a projection of 3.1 million MT of rice imports."

Are we turning our back to $60 billion in revenue streams plus three million metric tons of rice?

We can, once we become an industrial-investment economy. And once we recognize that rice production is not about food security. That like any industry, it presupposes the creation of a virtuous circle. For the longest time, we confined ourselves to productivity. And even at that, we failed.

To create a virtuous circle, demands forward-thinking. For example, beyond productivity, we must recognize that the market does not offer free lunch.

Competition. Competition. Competition.

And competition is beyond legislating and enacting a competitiveness commission. It is making our products and services desirable that consumers will want them. Think of Steve Jobs, a great innovator because he respected human dignity and understood that the hierarchy of human needs equipped people to thrive in this dynamic universe.

Of course, because of hubris, Padre Damaso saw it differently, no different from the scribes and Pharisees. That only he, not humankind, has the choice to create and pursue a virtuous circle.

Let’s pause and continue with a bit more of physics.

“Water seeks its ‘own’ level. That is a consequence of Pascal’s principle, whereby pressure transmits uniformly throughout a liquid.” [Wolfram Demonstrations Projects]

There are also universal laws like cause and effect, vibration, correspondence, and divine oneness.

For example, globalization is not an ism per se but reflects the law of “divine oneness” – as in the story of creation or the big bang – and mirrors the Pascal principle, i.e., water seeks its “own” level.

How does that relate to the real world? How are many simultaneous efforts in different countries in progress today to develop vaccines for COVID-19?

Why did our forebears engage in barter trade? It was not water they needed but things humankind needs but aren’t available locally follow the physics of water.

In case we have forgotten, there is such a thing as smuggling too. No matter how many barriers nations erect, it can’t guarantee to stop trafficking, for example.

How many of us grew up with the Cartimar market where smuggled goods from US military bases would magically appear?

The good news is that our economic managers don’t buy the idea that globalization is coming to a screeching halt.

“‘Tailor-fit’ perks eyed to lure investments, Julito G. Rada, manilastandard.net, 24th May 2020. Finance Secretary Carlos Dominguez III said he was pushing for a more proactive, targeted investment promotion strategy in a briefing. Of directly approaching the kind of foreign investors that the government wants to relocate here and offering them a set of tax and non-tax incentives tailor-fit to their needs, as part of the efforts to reenergize the economy and create more jobs.

“Dominguez said the government should discard its old ‘one-size-fits-all’ incentives program, and shift to a demand-driven approach. That means it identifies the types of industries that the economy needs to flourish, so incentives can be granted based on the industry players’ specific requirements that it wants to set up shop in the country.

“These industries include those that are labor-intensive and, thus, create stable, decent-paying jobs, provide excellent technology transfers that improve the country’s workforce skills, and have stable markets, Dominguez said.

‘We must identify these industries and then go to each of the companies, i.e., the leading companies in those industries around the world—and asking them: what do you need for you to come to the Philippines? Instead of waiting for them to apply, we should be going to them and offering them a package,’ Dominguez said.

“Dominguez said the obsolete ‘one-size-fits-all’ formula of attracting prospective investors failed to make the Philippines an investment magnet. That is why the country persistently lags its Southeast Asian counterparts in terms of the volume and amount of foreign direct investment inflows despite being among the region’s leading economies to offer fiscal incentives.

“On top of the massive infrastructure gap, which the Duterte administration is now fixing through its ‘Build, Build, Build’ program, and the constitutional restrictions on foreign ownership is the outmoded investment promotion strategy. That was among the reasons why the country lagged in the region in terms of FDI inflows despite the Philippines’ status as one of Asia’s fastest-growing economies.”

Thank God. We’re finally demonstrating dynamism and recognizing why we’ve become the regional laggard.

Recall the blog raised the real challenge we face. That we need incremental GDP of $200 billion – to get ahead of Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam and overcome poverty to the extent they did.

The major industries have the best chance to give us the quantum leap we badly need and why the above news from Sec. Dominguez is most welcome and can be a real game-changer for the Philippines.

What about the MSMEs? Let’s take them up in succeeding postings.

To end this posting, let’s get back to inertia at rest. How can we overcome it? Recall the 3Cs of the hardy mindset: (a) Commitment; (b) Challenge; (c) Control.

Until we commit to moving this nation forward, we won’t feel impelled to be the engine of this undertaking we call the Philippines. Because we won’t have the wherewithal to accept the challenge it presents. Likewise, until we stop blaming everyone and his uncle, we won’t recognize that the only one we control is Juan de la Cruz.

Gising na ba?


“Change begins when we finally choose to examine critically and then recalibrate the ill-serving codes and conventions handed down to us, often unquestioned, by the past and its power structures. It is essentially an act of imagination first.” [David Henry Thoreau; American essayist, poet, and philosopher; 1817-1862]

“Why independence, if the slaves of today will be the tyrants of tomorrow? Moreover, that they will be such is not to be doubted, for he who submits to tyranny loves it.” [We are ruled by Rizal’s ‘tyrants of tomorrow,’ Editorial, The Manila Times, 29th Dec 2015]

Now I know why Paul dared to speak of ‘the curse of the law’ (Galatians 3:13). Law reigns and discernment is unnecessary, which means there is little growth or change in such people. When you do not grow, you remain an infant.” [Faith and Science, Open to Change, Richard Rohr’s Daily Meditation, 23rd Oct 2017]

“As a major component for the education and reorientation of our people, mainstream media – their reporters, writers, photographers, columnists, and editors – have an obligation to this country . . .” [Era of documented irrelevance: Mainstream media, critics and protesters, Homobono A. Adaza, The Manila Times, 25th Nov 2015]

“National prosperity is created, not inherited. It does not grow out of a country’s natural endowments, its labor pool, its interest rates, or its currency’s value, as classical economics insists. [A] nation’s competitiveness depends on the capacity of its industry to innovate and upgrade.” [The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Michael E. Porter, Harvard Business Review, March–April 1990]

“You have to have a dream, whether big or small. Then plan, focus, work hard, and be very determined to achieve your goals.” [Henry Sy Sr., Chairman Emeritus and Founder, SM Group (1924 - 2019)]

“Learning and innovation go hand in hand. The arrogance of success is to think that what you did yesterday will be sufficient for tomorrow.” [William Pollard, 1911-1989, physicist-priest, Manhattan Project]

“Development is informed by a people’s worldview, cognitive capacity, values, moral development, self-identity, spirituality, and leadership . . .” [Frederic Laloux, Reinventing organizations, Nelson Parker, 2014]

Thursday, May 28, 2020

A drop in the bucket here – and there

[Why is ours a damaged culture? Then consider: We are too weak to face a pandemic and the 21st century. Beyond survive, how can we make Juan de la Cruz thrive?]

Do we recognize that we don’t forward-think? It’s not just Juan de la Cruz. Our biggest enterprises are behind our most significant shortcomings. Consider: We can’t provide the basics of water and electricity, for example.

That is why in a prior posting, the blog asked the question, can we think out-of-the-box?

And that we’re behind in infrastructure development counting decades. Should we even be surprised? Yet, there is no way we can justify these shortcomings. 

In other words, that is what a “drop in the bucket here and there” does to us. And it is consistent with a reactive as opposed to a proactive posture. Unsurprisingly, politicians know how to be on our right side and why retail politics undergirds our political system.

Forward-think. Forward-think. Forward-think.

If democracy is a government of the people, by the people, for the people, how shall we attain the promise of the system if we can’t see ourselves as its engine? And we will never get there because of our love for tyranny and value and submission to hierarchy and paternalism?

We simply take things in stride and claim, “we are the happiest people.” Is it “Que sera, sera” or Juan Tamad? Neither is a redeeming value. It explains why despite all the talks that “they’re just stopgaps,” they turned into our economic drivers: OFW remittances and BPO revenues.

To move forward, progress, develop – or “move up to the next level” – is to forward-think. That recalls the writer’s then newfound Eastern European friends – and why he committed to assisting them. “We have not made money in eight years, but our products are selling. We need to move up to the next level.”

Fast-forward to the COVID-19 pandemic – or 17 years later – they had all eight state-of-the-art factories running. As per an earlier post, they showed the local government how to manage the pandemic and led the business community to fund the campaign.

Consider: Their town is small, 80,000 people, while the company sells in 70 countries, i.e., they see more of the world than their townmates, including the government folks.

In other words, their mindset is to create a virtuous circle. Because they will be an utter disaster if they can’t figure out how to juggle so many balls, recall the levels in human development. They came out more robust and more prominent from the 2008 Global Recession, kicking the butts of Western giants. The EU Competitiveness Commission won’t recognize them as a model if they stayed with the status quo – as in “Que sera, sera.”

Experience. Experience. Experience.

It has nothing to do with IQ. But it presupposes the absence of parochialism and insularity and the caste system, to boot.

Benchmark. Benchmark. Benchmark.

When the writer first arrived, they asked, “What are the rules of the free enterprise system, we are new at it and aren’t making money.” There are no rules, only principles. 

On the other hand, we Pinoys instinctively fall into the trap of the isms because we don’t have the same level of development experience as our neighbors. Isms are human-made. We cannot just pull something off the shelf – be it socialism or capitalism or whatever – and force-fit it into Juan de la Cruz. 

There are no rules, only principles – as in relativism. It is not renouncing one’s faith but moving up in human development, from absolutism. It is thinking about thinking – aka metacognition. Or why we “think” how we “think.” See below; the recurring themes of the blog, i.e., to explain why we don’t forward-think.

Dynamism. Dynamism. Dynamism.

Try innovation. But it demands to create a virtuous circle. Think of photosynthesis – it is a 24/7 dynamic phenomenon.

It presupposes respect for human dignity. That humankind has a hierarchy of needs – that equipped them to thrive, not only survive, in this dynamic universe.

On the other hand, in the Philippines, we in the elite class prefer our gated communities. If to be parochial and insular is the game in town, we better do it in style. We can always toss dole-outs across the fence. Disclosure: The writer and family live in a gated community in suburban New York. As the blog has often said, the writer is Juan de la Cruz at heart.

Rank has its privileges, so says the caste system.

Why don’t we forward-think? We are parochial and insular. We value hierarchy and paternalism that we rely on political patronage and oligarchy that ours is a culture of impunity. That is why the blog calls it misplaced compassion; it is pulling rank and authority. I am superior to you – but recognize my status and privileges, and I will toss you manna – from me, not from heaven.

Beyond the debate on the lockdown, pouring money into the economy, and covering the needs, especially of the most vulnerable, all these things will only take us to the surface – assuming they are sufficient. But we are way behind the curve.

We need more – not rules of the tyrannical kind but principles that will create a virtuous circle for Juan de la Cruz.
Why did Marcos fail with his eleven major industrial projects? Why is Arangkada, AmBisyon, the 42 DTI’s road maps, and Tatak Pinoy still up in the air?

The OFW phenomenon came about in the mid-70s or almost 50 years ago. That is more than a generation. We’re now well into the 21st century that we like to talk about AI, robotics, the 4th industrial revolution, and whatever else. Yet, Juan de la Cruz still yells: “tubig.” And “kuryente.”

Those familiar with the blog will recall the writer did JVs in China and Vietnam. And today, these two countries are showing us the way. These people aren’t smarter than Juan de la Cruz! What is our problem then? Are we too smart for our “own” good?

To those of us in the chattering classes, why don’t we revisit what we’ve been pontificating over the last ten years or so? How can the Chinese and the Vietnamese be smarter than us?

Respect human dignity. 

And forget that we in the elite class can talk about hifalutin topics. And isms here and isms there.

That is if we care to learn innovation.

That is why at Yale, they have a course that anointed Steve Job a genius, among the greats like Einstein, Beethoven, Rembrandt, among others. He understood and respected human dignity. It explains why he was a great innovator.

Recall from an earlier posting, the wife, Laurene Powell Jobs, is committed to giving away the fortune she inherited. Because that was not what Jobs stood for. Those familiar with his story will recall he did not even buy pieces for their living room; that when Bill Gates visited, he went through the back door, knowing that there were chairs to sit on in the dining area.

He upended IBM despite the latter being consistently the holder of the most patents in the world because he focused on the dignity of humankind. He wanted a personal computer that will feed on our creativity. He assumed man is creative by nature. He understood music is the way to the soul that from the Mac, he moved to the iPod. Today, the company is into healthcare and wellness, opening the world to more advanced medical research and devices that will benefit humankind.

That is why the blog has raised the challenge to Messrs. Dominguez and Ang of a new way forward – and lead Juan de la Cruz to traverse the road from poverty to prosperity.

A drop in the bucket here and there will not cut it with due respect to our economic managers, not even TRAIN or whatever taxation mumbo jumbo we concoct. 

We need incremental GDP of $200 billion to put poverty in the rear-view mirror as our neighbors did. 

Our two top exports are in the right categories that will yield higher margins, i.e., like Samsung Vietnam and AirPods Vietnam, that we don’t have to mandate the UBI. Or why Vietnam can afford to pay such a level of wages.

Now we believe, despite COVID-19, we shall keep the BPO industry as a critical economic driver? That is the same old, same old, not the same quality of jobs they have in Vietnam. 

Likewise, we must pursue and create the virtuous circle in agriculture and MSMEs beyond technology manufacturing at the regional and global levels. And the blog presented them in earlier postings.

We need more than jobs; we need more than poverty alleviation. 

Not a drop in the bucket here and there.

Gising bayan!


“Change begins when we finally choose to examine critically and then recalibrate the ill-serving codes and conventions handed down to us, often unquestioned, by the past and its power structures. It is essentially an act of imagination first.” [David Henry Thoreau; American essayist, poet, and philosopher; 1817-1862]

“Why independence, if the slaves of today will be the tyrants of tomorrow? Moreover, that they will be such is not to be doubted, for he who submits to tyranny loves it.” [We are ruled by Rizal’s ‘tyrants of tomorrow,’ Editorial, The Manila Times, 29th Dec 2015]

Now I know why Paul dared to speak of ‘the curse of the law’ (Galatians 3:13). Law reigns and discernment is unnecessary, which means there is little growth or change in such people. When you do not grow, you remain an infant.” [Faith and Science, Open to Change, Richard Rohr’s Daily Meditation, 23rd Oct 2017]

“As a major component for the education and reorientation of our people, mainstream media – their reporters, writers, photographers, columnists, and editors – have an obligation to this country . . .” [Era of documented irrelevance: Mainstream media, critics and protesters, Homobono A. Adaza, The Manila Times, 25th Nov 2015]

“National prosperity is created, not inherited. It does not grow out of a country’s natural endowments, its labor pool, its interest rates, or its currency’s value, as classical economics insists. [A] nation’s competitiveness depends on the capacity of its industry to innovate and upgrade.” [The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Michael E. Porter, Harvard Business Review, March–April 1990]

“You have to have a dream, whether big or small. Then plan, focus, work hard, and be very determined to achieve your goals.” [Henry Sy Sr., Chairman Emeritus and Founder, SM Group (1924 - 2019)]

“Learning and innovation go hand in hand. The arrogance of success is to think that what you did yesterday will be sufficient for tomorrow.” [William Pollard, 1911-1989, physicist-priest, Manhattan Project]

“Development is informed by a people’s worldview, cognitive capacity, values, moral development, self-identity, spirituality, and leadership . . .” [Frederic Laloux, Reinventing organizations, Nelson Parker, 2014]

Friday, May 22, 2020

Our absolutist approach to poverty

[Why is ours a damaged culture? Then consider: We are too weak to face a pandemic and the 21st century. Beyond survive, how can we make Juan de la Cruz thrive?]

Can we think out-of-the-box?
How come supposedly more impoverished Vietnam has only a third of our poverty rate? Yet, our failure isn’t from lack of trying.

We have been waging war against poverty for the longest time. Start with the comprehensive agrarian reform program. And because rural poverty far exceeds that of urban poverty, we continue to focus on the challenge, including the emphasis on LGUs where we put our money where our mouth is.

LGUs now have their share of tax revenues courtesy of the national government. And we want to follow that up with Federalism. And with the election of Duterte, there has been an apparent effort to direct investment in Davao. 

And not to forget the 4Ps.

We were awed by Duterte’s war on drugs in Davao, and we applauded when he made this into his agenda as president.

Beyond an absolutist approach to poverty, we now have a mirror image of the war on drugs.

Let’s pause there for a moment. And ponder. Is this our reality?

How come supposedly more impoverished Vietnam has only a third of our poverty rate? And they’re not done yet. They are in acceleration mode and soon will leave us in the dust, as did the Asian Tigers before them. And the signs don’t bode well. Beyond the pandemic, our caste system hasn’t faded an iota because of our love for tyranny. 

Consider: When the blog started (2009), it quoted Vietnam’s exports at $48.07 billion against our $49.32 billion (2007/8). Think of that as we go through the rest of this posting.

As the blog has maintained, our lack of experience in development gives us fewer options and perspectives on the way forward. We’re stuck with the same old, same old. Yet, being the incurable optimists, we assume that things will change for the better. After decades of submission – as in “que sera, sera” – we can only make Einstein incredulous. We reap what we sow. 

In the meantime, to overcome poverty, we believe we must mandate our enterprises to abide by the universal basic income. Paying the UBI, indeed, will address poverty. But other than that, it is classic absolutist thinking that won’t see the light of day.

As the war on poverty (as we know it) won’t see the light of day. Despite being a $20+ trillion economy and generates over $400 billion in charity contributions, not even America has won the war on poverty.

In the war on drugs, only Portugal has bragging rights. But they did not see it as a war to be fought – and kill people. They saw it as a wellness challenge, so they employed the virtuous circle model – because wellness is not a one-dimensional enterprise.

A virtuous circle is what we as a people, must seek if we are to thrive in this dynamic universe, we call home. It is not black or white or an absolutist world. 

Why is it Vietnam showing us the way?

Consider: Unlike us, Vietnam isn’t parochial and insular. Nor are they beholden to a caste system. They benchmarked against Singapore, Malaysia, and China and concluded that they must likewise be partners with a wealthier nation, South Korea.

They did not bark at the wrong tree of poverty. Instead, Vietnam took the road from poverty to prosperity. And are poised to overtake even Singapore. People go with the winners, not the losers. Surprise, surprise, even Apple moved their AirPods manufacturing to Vietnam.

Let’s look at some numbers to make the treatise more tangible.

Samsung Vietnam had export revenues (2017) of $58 billion. Vietnam’s total exports in 2019 were $304.3 billion. 

Do they have to mandate the UBI to address poverty?

In other words, did Portugal kill people to overcome the drug menace?
But let’s intrude into the Zoom discussions of Boo Chanco and his FEF friends. “Never waste a crisis,” Boo Chanco, DEMAND AND SUPPLY, The Philippine Star, 1st May 2020.

“My friends at the Foundation for Economic Freedom (FEF) are hopeless ‘incrementalists.’ We endlessly talk about this reform or another and often rejoice if one pet reform appears to be on the verge of being realized.

“We also believe we should never waste a crisis. When a crisis strikes, we think it may make our reform agenda possible.”

How can we make our reform agenda possible?

Vietnam did not say we must focus on raising consumption because the world is turning inward. Note the Apple-Vietnam AirPod partnership is fresh out of the oven. In other words, they will grow even more their staggering export receipts of $304.3 billion.

And where are we? In 2019, our exports were $70.3 billion, a mere fraction of Vietnam’s. And 64.4% came from two categories: (1) Electrical machinery & equipment, 49.3% or $32.7 billion; (2) Machinery, including computers, 15.1% or $10.6 billion. 

While fruits and nuts came in third at 3.7% or $2.6 billion, but growing 25.5% or to $3.263 billion, if we make a one-year projection.

For comparative purposes, let’s again put up the numbers for our eight top listed companies. Compared to Samsung Vietnam’s export revenues (2017) of $58 billion, our top enterprises delivered much less, $43.1 billion.

And this is where Pareto comes in. If we are to overcome poverty like Vietnam did, we must generate export revenues much more than $70.3 billion. 

Let’s hold it there: That is what our challenge is, not a drop in the bucket here and a drop in the bucket there.

Otherwise, we shall continue to rely on MSMEs to take on the bulk of employment of roughly two-thirds. And they cannot pay the UBI. 

But what about agriculture? See above; fruits and nuts are among our top exports. But then again, we must go beyond the analysis and do the analytics and forward-think. How do we create a virtuous circle in this industry?

Not by staying with the same old, same old. If we must benchmark and figure out how to replicate the Samsung Vietnam phenomenon, we must do likewise with fruits and nuts. How do we make a full circle from farming to globally competitive packaged food and beverages? And a similar exercise applies. What is the next Samsung Vietnam or AirPods Vietnam?

For example, how do we replicate the pig industry of Denmark or tree farming in Sweden? “White men can’t jump.” But we can. 

Consider: The writer’s Eastern European friends had all eight state-of-the-art factories running amid the pandemic. [They have something akin to a mini export processing zone except everything from product idea to finished product is in-house.] And the team in New York had their higher shipments arriving in higher quantities. That is why it’s called a virtuous circle.

To do the analytics is to forward-think.

In 2014, the writer sat through two economic briefings (Ateneo and UP), and he thought he was on another planet. Everyone was waxing poetic about the uptick in manufacturing. And so, the writer asked the rhetorical question, what’s the basis of the uptick? Local consumption and the global value chain (GVC) were the drivers. That is the analysis piece. 

But no one was talking about the analytics. OFW remittances and BPO revenues give us a free pass and cover our sins of omissions and commissions – aka the “Dutch Disease.” 

But where’s the analytics? It demands forward-thinking!

Ergo: There was no reason to celebrate, given how neighbors are leaving us in the dust export-wise.

After that bit of an aside, let’s get back and look at fruits and nuts. We’re in the process of identifying our priority for this first go-around. They miss the Pareto cut. So, we shall leave them aside briefly.

We must then look at the two categories responsible for 64.4% of our exports (a) electrical machinery and equipment and (b) machinery, including computers.

The blog, several postings ago, gave the example of a small Guangzhou enterprise that did their homework and learned that the writer’s old MNC-company was the global market leaders in their business. This Chinese enterprise had only their brand and dilapidated factory to offer. Because the JV had bigger plans than they thought, they had to reveal, “We are a poor Chinese enterprise. We rely on you for money and technology.”

Think of the Vietnamese; they were able to partner with Samsung and recently with Apple. That is not rocket science. That is the absence of parochialism and insularity and the caste system.

Enter: Messrs. Dominguez and Ang. They can have DTI, if not their respective organizations, figure out and then come up with a shortlist of brands and enterprises that are in the big league within our two top exports. Which is the next Samsung Vietnam or AirPods Vietnam?

If a small Guangzhou enterprise can knock on the door of a Fortune 500 company headquartered on Park Avenue in New York, why can’t Messrs. Dominguez and Ang be able to tap on whatever doors?

But let’s get back to Boo and his FEF friends. Where do we think we must locate a project or a couple of them, given the magnitude of our challenge? In other words, where will these global behemoths want their manufacturing facilities located? That we have a “one-product, one-province” program? And they must respect it?
They will want a location that gives them the infrastructure that will sustain their capacity as world-class enterprises, not misplaced compassion.

But that is where the crab mentality kills us. And Pareto too. We don’t recognize the impact of getting the biggest bang for the buck. Economists call it the multiplier effect. 

But why? Again, because of our lack of experience in development, we are yet to move up in the levels of human development. Recall the square-one is absolutism. 

Consider: We need a few humongous economic hubs that will radiate beyond their boundaries.

Let’s again pause and recall how we project our self-image when dealing with the rest of the world. We kicked out the US military because our caste system tells us we shall forever be beholden to a colonizer, and that is a no, no.

Likewise, we are parochial and insular and have a one-product, one-province program. 

What to do – in the absence of experience?

Benchmark. Benchmark. Benchmark.

Enter: the Pearl River Delta economic development zone. It is more prominent than big. Think of Central Luzon beyond Metro Manila.

How did China describe the Pearl River Delta? “The region cannot be a single city due to sheer physical land extent – slightly exceeds that of Massachusetts and rings around water bodies much like San Francisco.” [Wikipedia]

It is not enough to say we must decongest Metro Manila. We must create a virtuous circle by benchmarking against the Pearl River Delta and crafting a game plan for Central Luzon.

“Since the onset of China’s reform program, the Pearl River Delta Economic Zone has been the fastest-growing portion of the fastest-growing province in the fastest-growing large economy in the world.

“It is a world leader in the production of electronic goods, electrical products, electrical and electronic components, watches and clocks, toys, garments and textiles, plastic products, and a range of other goods.”

Benchmarking will also tell us how they crafted their investment incentives, including taxation. In other words, beyond the analysis exercise we did behind our tax rationalization initiative, we must then do the analytics and forward-think. Where will a tax rationalization effort get the biggest bang for the buck?

Again, it is not rocket science but simple arithmetic. For example, if we start with the hypothesis that we need incremental GDP of $200 billion to get ahead of Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam, we shall generate a far higher yield on our tax rationalization initiative than assume revenues coming from current revenue streams.

The bottom line: We must start somewhere in the quest to create a virtuous circle, and then we can prioritize the rest, and that includes fruits and nuts, of the industries from Arangkada, AmBisyon, the 42 DTI’s road maps, and Tatak Pinoy. 

We can then look at our other economic hubs and expand them accordingly, Cebu, Cagayan de Oro, and Davao.
“There will still be centers like Manila, Cebu, but there should be a hierarchy of local clusters that will lead to the development of their areas. Development is spread out in space as we re-examine geographic structure.” [Chanco, op. cit.]

The exercise starts with prioritizing the enterprises that will generate the kind of revenues that will address poverty. It is not the other way, where we insist on addressing poverty, yet clueless about how we will pay for it. 

The exercise, as presented in recent postings, is to generate incremental GDP of $200 billion and get us ahead of Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam.

Can we think out-of-the-box?

Gising bayan!


“Change begins when we finally choose to examine critically and then recalibrate the ill-serving codes and conventions handed down to us, often unquestioned, by the past and its power structures. It is essentially an act of imagination first.” [David Henry Thoreau; American essayist, poet, and philosopher; 1817-1862]

“Why independence, if the slaves of today will be the tyrants of tomorrow? Moreover, that they will be such is not to be doubted, for he who submits to tyranny loves it.” [We are ruled by Rizal’s ‘tyrants of tomorrow,’ Editorial, The Manila Times, 29th Dec 2015]

Now I know why Paul dared to speak of ‘the curse of the law’ (Galatians 3:13). Law reigns and discernment is unnecessary, which means there is little growth or change in such people. When you do not grow, you remain an infant.” [Faith and Science, Open to Change, Richard Rohr’s Daily Meditation, 23rd Oct 2017]

“As a major component for the education and reorientation of our people, mainstream media – their reporters, writers, photographers, columnists, and editors – have an obligation to this country . . .” [Era of documented irrelevance: Mainstream media, critics and protesters, Homobono A. Adaza, The Manila Times, 25th Nov 2015]

“National prosperity is created, not inherited. It does not grow out of a country’s natural endowments, its labor pool, its interest rates, or its currency’s value, as classical economics insists. [A] nation’s competitiveness depends on the capacity of its industry to innovate and upgrade.” [The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Michael E. Porter, Harvard Business Review, March–April 1990]

“You have to have a dream, whether big or small. Then plan, focus, work hard, and be very determined to achieve your goals.” [Henry Sy Sr., Chairman Emeritus and Founder, SM Group (1924 - 2019)]

“Learning and innovation go hand in hand. The arrogance of success is to think that what you did yesterday will be sufficient for tomorrow.” [William Pollard, 1911-1989, physicist-priest, Manhattan Project]

“Development is informed by a people’s worldview, cognitive capacity, values, moral development, self-identity, spirituality, and leadership . . .” [Frederic Laloux, Reinventing organizations, Nelson Parker, 2014]