“[The
country’s] economic troubles are often attributed to a public
sector packed full of redundant workers . . . Often overlooked,
however, is the role played by a handful of wealthy families,
politicians and the news media — often owned by the magnates —
that make up the [nation's] power structure . . . The average
[person] is growing increasingly resentful of an oligarchy
that, critics say, presides over an opaque, closed economy that is at
the root of many of the country’s problems and operates with
virtual impunity. Several dozen powerful families control critical
sectors, including banking, shipping and construction, and can
usually count on the political class to look out for their interests,
sometimes by passing legislation tailored to their specific needs.”
[NY Times, 5th Dec 2012, For Greece, Oligarchs Are Obstacle to
Recovery.]
“The result,
analysts say, is a lack of competition that undermines the economy by
allowing the magnates to run cartels and enrich themselves through
crony capitalism. “That makes it rational for them to form a close,
incestuous relationship with politicians and the media, which is then
highly vulnerable to corruption,” said Kevin
Featherstone, a professor of European Politics at the London
School of Economics.”
It is about Greece but
could it be said of PHL too? “[The] anticorruption watchdog
Transparency International ranked Greece [no. 94, ahead of PHL, no.
105] as the most corrupt nation in Europe, behind former Soviet
states like Bulgaria, Romania and Slovakia . . . But it
remains an open question whether Greece’s leaders will be able to
engineer such a transformation.”
Is it about being Pinoy
then or being Greek? The New York Times article spells it out: “For
Greece, Oligarchs Are Obstacle to Recovery.” It brings to mind
the book, “Why Nations Fail,” that the co-author, James A.
Robinson, discussed with a cross-section of our society. “Dr.
Robinson says that societies that succeeded in achieving prosperity
for most of their people are those that made both political as well
as economic institutions more open and responsive to the majority of
the population. These societies rewarded innovation or new and better
ways of doing things, and allowed everyone to participate in economic
opportunities, not just a few elites, and had governments that were
responsive and politically accountable to its people.” [Manila
Bulletin, 3rd Dec 2012]
Unfortunately, Juan de la
Cruz easily gets it in one ear and out the other? And so a news
report like the following is to be expected? “Investment
goal likely to be missed,” reports Business World, 6th Dec
2012. Too bad so sad – we've had this challenge for decades and
like a broken record it just keeps on playing? Garbage-in,
garbage-out? Our pathetic economic output and thus poverty is visible
from miles away – because we have been protecting ourselves from
investments (and technologies) from the outside for decades, and
proudly so because of our brand of patriotism?
And, unfortunately, man
can defy the obvious? “We targeted around P400 billion
[investments] but we will be happy to surpass -- just a little --
last year’s number of P369 billion because the baseline is high . .
.” [ibid]. Sounds wishful thinking? Or is it our
trademark "pwede na 'yan"? Perhaps we can learn from
the new Apple CEO, Tim Cook: "Being gentle and being a
pushover are two different things,” is how one analyst
described him.
No comments:
Post a Comment