“When we get into
times of social, political or financial instability, our comfort
zones get smaller. The more afraid we are . . . the more impenetrable
our comfort zones buffers become.” [Tiptoeing Out of One’s
Comfort Zone (and of Course, Back In), Alina Tugend, The New
York Times, 11th Feb 2011] “There was a huge shift after
9/11 . . . in just how vulnerable people were willing to be in their
personal and work lives. When we feel vulnerable . . . we often feel
fear and shame. And, since those are some of our most difficult
emotions, we want to avoid them.”
“Our
response to the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and international
terrorism has been remarkable, including an intelligence apparatus in
which some 1.4 million people (including, until recently, Snowden)
hold “top secret” clearances.” [How
Could We Blow This One, Nicholas D. Kristof, The New York Times, 3rd
Jul 2013] “That’s
more than twice the population of the District of Columbia . . .
[S]ince 9/11, the United States has built new intelligence complexes
equivalent in office space to 22 United States Capitol buildings. All
told, since 9/11, the United States has spent $8 trillion on the
military and homeland security . . .”
“Some
of that money probably helped avert other terrorist attacks (although
some of it spent in Iraq and Afghanistan may have increased risks).
We need a robust military and intelligence network, for these threats
are real. An Al Qaeda attack is an assault on the political system in
a way that an ordinary murder is not. And overseas terrorists do
aspire to commit mass murder again, perhaps with chemical, nuclear or
biological weapons, and our government is right to work hard to
prevent such a cataclysm.
“But
there are trade-offs, including other ways to protect the public, and
our entire focus seems to be on national security rather than on more
practical ways of assuring our safety. The imbalance in our
priorities is particularly striking because since 2005, terrorism has
taken an average of 23 American lives annually, mostly overseas —
and the number has been falling.”
“Moving out of our
comfort zones is supposed to be a good thing. We challenge ourselves,
we grow and take on new risks. But is this always true? After all,
over the last few years, many of us have been pushed out of our
comfort zones, forced to seek new jobs, even careers.” [Ibid.]
“The comfort zone is a behavioral state within which a person
operates in an anxiety-neutral position. Judith M. Bardwick, author
of “Danger in the Comfort Zone” (American Management Association,
1991) . . . cites a famous
experiment conducted by the psychologists Robert M.
Yerkes and John D. Dodson, way back in 1908. Using mice, they found
that stimulation improved performance, up to a certain level — what
is now known as optimal anxiety. When that level is passed, and we’re
under too much stress, performance deteriorates.”
“We need a place of
productive discomfort . . . If you’re too comfortable, you’re not
productive. And if you’re too uncomfortable, you’re not
productive. Like Goldilocks, we can’t be too hot or too cold . . .
The objective is to reach that optimal level so that our skills
increase and we become comfortable with that new level of anxiety —
then we’re in an expanded comfort zone. And ideally, we will get
more used to those feelings of “productive discomfort” and won’t
be so scared to try new things in the future.”
I often talk about my
Eastern European friends and from living and working with them for
ten years, I’ve witnessed how much of a struggle they have gone
through to “expand their comfort zone.” And so I would always
say, “been here ten years and counting.” What more of one hundred
million Pinoys? Friends have asked me, do you really think we could
change our culture? Probably not, but over time we could expand our
comfort zone and be more receptive to change? Man has proved himself
adaptable since the time of Eden. And even Steve Jobs would admit:
"All the work that I have done in my life
will be obsolete by the time I'm 50," he said in a previously
unreleased video recorded in 1994, when he was 39. “This is not a
field where one paints a painting that will be looked at for
centuries, or builds a church that will be admired for centuries.”
[The Times UK, 21st Jun 2013]
No comments:
Post a Comment