Sunday, June 28, 2020

Reorder follows disorder

“The new organization’s second secretary-general, Dag Hammarskjold, observed, the UN ‘came about not to take mankind to heaven but to save humanity from hell.’ For 75 years, there have been no world wars (though too many smaller ones). Unlike its precursor, the League of Nations, the UN has proved resilient. Its membership has grown from 51 countries to 193, through decolonization and the break-up of the Soviet empire. It sits amid a rules-based world order, and its activities and those of its specialized agencies span almost every aspect of life.

“Yet no international order lasts forever. Over time the balance of power shifts, systems fail to adapt, and the rot sets in. The peace after the Congress of Vienna in 1815 eroded slowly; that after the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 collapsed fast. A change from one dominant power to another has usually meant war (the shift from Britain to America over a century ago being a rare exception).

“The UN wants to use its 75th anniversary for a grand consultation on the future of multilateralism. Covid-19 has hijacked the global agenda. But it also creates an opportunity. Rather than destroying the system, the upheaval could spur countries into strengthening it. That will require planning for the future while tackling the crisis of the present. Today’s leaders need to emulate what their predecessors achieved so magnificently in 1945.” [The new world disorder, The Economist, 18th Jun 2020]

The writer can’t help but break into a smile, reading the referenced issue of The Economist. Coincidentally, after its cover story titled “Goodbye Globalization,” 16th May 2020, the newspaper surveyed its subscribers. And the writer dutifully responded. Here’s to paraphrase his overall comments: I challenge The Economist to address this universe’s characteristics; for example, it is a 24/7, dynamic phenomenon.

Those familiar with the blog won’t find that new. It is a recurrent theme of the postings.

But let’s get to the Philippines. As the blog has emphasized, it will take lots of doing – i.e., experience – before questioning the way we think. That is consistent with the science of metacognition.

But let’s also challenge the “Padre Damaso” in Juan de la Cruz – via a bit of Franciscan theology. Recall they represent the minority view and why today the Catholic Church has “two popes.” The Franciscans have been melding faith with science via a group of theologian-scientists, and Pope Francis belongs to the school – supporting the efforts. [Einstein had a cleric-physicist friend in the Manhattan project, William Pollard, referenced among the closing quotes of every posting in this blog.]

“The Bible reveals the development of human consciousness and human readiness for a Divine Love Affair. The differences between earlier and later Scriptures clearly show an evolution of human capacity, comprehension, and depth of experience. Jesus represents the mature image of what God is doing in history.

“In Israel’s growth as a people, we see the pattern that happens to every individual and to every community that sets out on the journey of faith. Israel is the ‘womb of the Incarnation,’ for it is in their history that the whole drama endured. Jesus fully grows up inside that womb. And we must grow up too.

“Little by little, human consciousness is prepared to see how God loves and liberates us. But we will face plenty of resistance, revealed in the constant hostility to Jesus even and most especially from religious people, ending in the very ‘killing of God.’

“There are many models of human and spiritual development. We could describe three stages as Simple Consciousness, Complex Consciousness (both ‘fight and flight’), and Non-Dual Consciousness (‘the unitive way' or 'third way'). I have been calling the developmental stages Order > Disorder > Reorder. In short, I see this pattern in the Bible and human lives:

“Order: We begin with almost entirely tribal thinking, mirroring the individual journey, which starts with an egocentric need for ‘order’ and ‘self.’ Only gradually do we move toward inclusive love.

“Disorder: We slowly recognize the invitation to a ‘face to face’ love affair through the biblical dialogue of election, failure, sin, and grace, which matures the soul. That is where we need wisdom teachers to guide us through our ‘disorder.’

“Reorder: Among a symbolic few, there is a breakthrough to unitive consciousness (for example, figures like Abraham and Sarah, Moses, David, the Psalmists, many of the prophets, Job, Mary, Mary Magdalene, Jesus, and Paul). That is also what some call enlightenment or salvation.

“Conservatives usually get trapped in the first stage while progressives are in the second, and only a minority of either group seems to get to the third. The last step is considered dangerous to people in the first stage and rather unknown and invisible to people in the second stage.

“If you can’t trust in both love and mystery and also some ability to hold anxiety and paradox, all of which allow the ‘divine’ entry into the soul, you will not proceed very far on the spiritual journey. You will often run back to stage one when the going gets rough in phase two. The great weakness of much Western spirituality is that there is little understanding of the necessity of darkness and ‘not knowing’ (which is the transformative alchemy of faith). That is what keeps so much religion at stage one.

“We only need enough light to be able to trust the darkness. That is a wonderful way to grow in human love too. Darkness, mistakes, and trials are the supreme teachers. Success teaches you nothing; it just feels good.” [Order, Disorder, Reorder, Fr. Richard Rohr, OFM, Daily Meditations, 23rd Feb 2016]

In other words, even in the real world, decision-making can’t be reduced to a quantitative exercise. Recall how the blog discusses the difference between “analysis” and “analytics.” The latter demands forward-thinking, including visualizing scenarios, fleshed out with assumptions and data.

The world we live in is living color, not black and white. Recall how the writer guided the then Ph.D. candidate: I never used the Markov algorithm. Today, this person is the Global Marketing Director of a billion-dollar-plus brand.

That is why the blog wants to keep Padre Damaso in our consciousness. He can’t be a supreme teacher. Permanence is not of this world. That is why we Filipinos must step up to the plate and toss our caste system.

Success feels right, especially given the trappings that come with it; rank has its privileges. Sadly, the dark side is reprehensible – our proud nation is the regional laggard.

And we in the elite class can’t help but play our paternalism card. We want to fix poverty, the drug menace, plus terrorism – to boot. And so, we keep building a shack – as in “pwede na ‘yan” – instead of designing and engineering a stately home for Juan de la Cruz.

It is not merely to rob Peter to pay Paul, even worse, to perpetuate the crab mentality.

We must discard the status quo from our consciousness. Sadly, we can’t see beyond the obvious and logical because of our lack of experience in development. We aren’t predisposed to forward-think.

Why would we in the elite class want to change when we are the ones calling the shots?

“Foreign investors discouraged by lack of progress on tax reform laws,” Beatrice M. Laforga, BusinessWorld, 22nd Jun 2020. “THE Philippines needs to address the lack of clarity on investment policy, which discourages foreign direct investment (FDI), an economist from Fitch Solutions Country Risk & Industry Research said.”

Are we still wondering why we’re the regional laggard? How often do we hear “lack of progress” and “lack of clarity” in reform laws and investment policy from foreign investors?

Our conversations speak volumes about what our priorities are and what we value. Think De Lima and Ressa on the one hand, and the anti-terrorism bill on the other. And there is the failed war on drugs and war on poverty. Not to forget, we are now the biggest rice importer when the IRRI was once our pride and joy. Translation: We are such losers we can easily throw away a competitive advantage.

And a short distance from the Philippines is Vietnam. And they are poised to overtake Singapore. If we are as confused as Trump and his cohort on how to deal with COVID-19, Vietnam, yes, it is them again, has done an excellent job in overcoming the pandemic.

The bottom line: Can we ever demonstrate progress? What about clarity?

The blog keeps recalling that by the end of the year, it will be in its twelfth year. And over that period, when the writer kept abreast with how we as an economy and nation has progressed, he is the least surprised that foreign investors are confused if we’re coming or going.

Consider these simple questions: Where are we? Where do we want to be? How do we get there?

Will we ever see the day when Juan de la Cruz will merely say, “We want to traverse the road from poverty to prosperity”? How did Vietnam bag these enterprises – Samsung Vietnam and AirPods Vietnam? That they rapidly broke the back of poverty?

We’re supposed to be a lot smarter than the Vietnamese, or at least we thought so?

There is no clarity in our thinking as foreign investors complain. Unsurprisingly, they see no progress in reform and policy efforts.

Consider our instincts: We are parochial and insular. We value hierarchy and paternalism that we rely on political patronage and oligarchy that ours is a culture of impunity.

Why can’t we just say that we want to traverse the road from poverty to prosperity? Because of our caste system, we in the elite class wish to preserve the status quo. We want to maintain rank and privilege.

We instead highlight that we’re over one hundred million strong – skewed to young people, population-wise. And that is a sweet spot in the economy.  Sadly, that is wishful thinking and adds insult to injury.

Why? We’re stuck as a service-consumption economy. The insult is exploiting Juan de la Cruz – the overseas Filipino worker – and is going almost fifty years because we failed to move up to an industrial-investment economy. 

Let’s pause right there and revisit a handful of essential numbers.

And we can start with poverty, the Philippines versus Vietnam. Our poverty rate is 16.6% against Vietnam’s 5.8%.

Then consider the high side of OFW remittances plus the BPO revenues of $60 billion. They are the drivers of our economy, and because of prudent monetary and fiscal policies, we can grow the economy between 6%-6.5%, the global yardstick for a fast-growing economy. 

And that is why our economic managers are in celebratory mode. But that is why we now own the “Dutch disease.” We have not created a sustainable enterprise ecosystem, as did our neighbors – of an industrial-investment economy. And their common denominator cannot be overemphasized, foreign money and technology.

Unsurprisingly, it will take a generation before we see the light at the end of the tunnel. In the meantime, we developed the penchant for the knee-jerk and quick fixes. Sadly, they can be counterproductive and can undermine the future. For example, we struggle to undo the negatives of the comprehensive agrarian reform that we can’t pursue economies of scale. In the meantime, Vietnam is more than glad to export rice to us.

One example is a microcosm of the lack of progress and clarity that foreign investors see in our country.

In fairness, because of the above growth rate, our debt to GDP is very healthy at 42% when it was once at 80%. That is why the blog said we could aggressively set a very aggressive post-COVID-19 “recovery” package.

The bottom line: Our economy isn’t on a trajectory similar to Vietnam and why they are poised to overtake Singapore. In other words, we’re near yet so far. And it appears we can’t wrap our head around that reality.

Consider: Despite our strong local economy – being service-consumption oriented – we still cannot generate the revenues to rapidly build the structure necessary for nation-building. And the underbelly of this strong local economy was exposed by COVID-19 and the lockdown that came with it.

Think of why we lag in infrastructure development, even the basics of water and electricity. And we must add that in higher education, we are the regional laggard too. And that is a very sorry state of affairs. We cannot turn that around overnight – especially when we consider our instincts and why ours is a culture of impunity. Higher education reflects our culture.

Our weaknesses are beyond the mediocre response to the pandemic. And while some LGUs did a better job, that still does not address the immense challenge we face in nation-building.

On the other hand, Vietnam’s exports (2019) are at a staggering $304.3-B compared to our $70.3-B. Their enormous export receipts negate their disadvantage in the local economy – which is our strength. Again because of OFW remittances and the BPO revenues.

As economists say, the multiplier effect of an export-driven, industrial-investment economy is far more significant than a local, service-consumption economy.

In other words, rapid economic development, as Singapore demonstrated impacts society beyond what we think is possible. The operative word being “rapid.” For example, Singapore is now more competitive compared to the US.

It is not a mystery when an enterprise creates a virtuous circle, an ecosystem that is sustainable. Consider: They started with foreign money and technology that gave them a leg up to produce world-class products and services.

And the outcome is for all to see, humongous export receipts. And as we see in China, the experience gives them the ability to progress and advance technology-wise. 

That is why the blog keeps plugging Vietnam. But we Pinoys can’t seem to recognize that we have our neighbors to benchmark.

What to do? Let’s engage in the war on poverty and drugs and terrorism. That is how out-of-step and archaic we are as a nation. 

In the meantime, COVID-19 added fuel to the fire. But then again, we live in a universe that is a 24/7, dynamic phenomenon. 

After disorder, reorder must follow.

Gising bayan!


“But the fault was chiefly their own. Filipinos profess the love of country, but love themselves – individually – more.” [Ninoy Aquino, Foreign Affairs magazine, July 1968; Stanley Karnow, New York Times Magazine, “Cory Aquino’s Downhill Slide,” 19th Aug 1990.]

“Why independence, if the slaves of today will be the tyrants of tomorrow? Moreover, that they will be such is not to be doubted, for he who submits to tyranny loves it.” [We are ruled by Rizal’s ‘tyrants of tomorrow,’ Editorial, The Manila Times, 29th Dec 2015]

“True social reform has little to do with politics. To unmoor ourselves from the burdens of the past, we must be engaged in the act of continual and conscious self-renewal. All men are partially buried in the grave of custom. Even virtue is no longer such if it is stagnant.

“Change begins when we finally choose to examine critically and then recalibrate the ill-serving codes and conventions handed down to us, often unquestioned, by the past and its power structures. It is essentially an act of imagination first.” [David Henry Thoreau; American essayist, poet, and philosopher; 1817-1862]

“National prosperity is created, not inherited. It does not grow out of a country’s natural endowments, its labor pool, its interest rates, or its currency’s value, as classical economics insists. [A] nation’s competitiveness depends on the capacity of its industry to innovate and upgrade.” [The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Michael E. Porter, Harvard Business Review, March–April 1990]

“You have to have a dream, whether big or small. Then plan, focus, work hard, and be very determined to achieve your goals.” [Henry Sy Sr., Chairman Emeritus and Founder, SM Group (1924 - 2019)]

“Learning and innovation go hand in hand. The arrogance of success is to think that what you did yesterday will be sufficient for tomorrow.” [William Pollard, 1911-1989, physicist-priest, Manhattan Project]

“Development is informed by a people’s worldview, cognitive capacity, values, moral development, self-identity, spirituality, and leadership . . .” [Frederic Laloux, Reinventing organizations, Nelson Parker, 2014]

Now I know why Paul dared to speak of ‘the curse of the law’ (Galatians 3:13). Law reigns and discernment is unnecessary, which means there is little growth or change in such people. When you do not grow, you remain an infant.” [Faith and Science, Open to Change, Richard Rohr’s Daily Meditation, 23rd Oct 2017]

“As a major component for the education and reorientation of our people, mainstream media – their reporters, writers, photographers, columnists, and editors – have an obligation to this country . . .” [Era of documented irrelevance: Mainstream media, critics and protesters, Homobono A. Adaza, The Manila Times, 25th Nov 2015]

Tuesday, June 23, 2020

We must come to grips with the reality

Denial cannot be a default setting; otherwise, we shall continually be confronted by a perfect storm – that can only get worse before it gets better as we know it.

Let’s do a shortlist of the why: (1) Our caste system; (2) The hubris aka entitlement that comes with the first one; (3) Our culture of impunity that punctuates the shortlist.

How did we become the regional laggard? From the mid-70s, or almost half a century ago, when the OFW phenomenon came to life, we have exploited over 10 million Filipinos. That we now own the “Dutch disease.”

Put another way; we did not move up from a service-consumption economy. Instead, we kept bragging about our management of fiscal and monetary policies.

That may be Greek to us? Because to react is our comfort zone while being proactive demands forward-thinking and presupposes dynamism. Why do we lag in infrastructure development, even in the basics of water and electricity?

Should we drill it down?

Recall that in the beginning, we acknowledged that the OFW phenomenon was a stopgap. But then we played deaf and dumb – as in “pwede na ‘yan” – that it has taken a life of its own. 

Consider: To keep up with 21st-century technology, we created a DICT, and we want free Wi-Fi and gear up for 5G. We are a service-consumption economy, and we want to be in the big league? 

Singapore may be a teensy city-state that can’t be an industrial hub, but it is in the big league because its GDP per capita matches that of the US; while we are a third-world country. And our higher education, like the economy, is the regional laggard.

Are we still surprised? Did we not want food security to define our efforts behind rice production? And we ended up at the exact opposite outcome being the biggest rice importer in the world? 

What about water and electricity and infrastructure development in general?

In other words, do we know if we’re coming or going? It is about building an ecosystem – as in a virtuous circle, not kicking up a perfect storm or a vicious circle.

Then consider: Our income stream is not coming from our management of the economy. In private sector lingo, it is not from “operations.” And in the case of our economy, it is from the miseries of families that couldn’t make both ends meet they had to become OFWs.

The social costs are for all to see. Yet, we like to shout out that we’re the epitome of the holy family. Yes, because we are the present-day Padre Damaso. Forget about the broken families and that the country has one of the fastest-growing numbers of HIV cases worldwide.

We created eight listed companies that made it to the Forbes list – and a few billionaires. And we in the elite class are hunky-dory. But blind to the reality that we are the laughingstock of the region, if not the world. Not even the DICT and free Wi-Fi and 5G and the BPOs that came earlier can add up to right our abysmal structure as a third-world country. 

Recall the prior posting on cause and effect. No amount of “pwede na ‘yan” can rapidly compensate and raise us from our pathetic income per capita. See above, building an ecosystem.

If we still can’t figure it out, God bless us!

How did our neighbors leave us in the dust? Aren’t they industrial-investment economies?

That is how they developed an innovation culture and global competitiveness, which are imperative to thrive in the 21st century. And we must not forget that these neighbors begged for foreign money and technology.

Sadly, it will take lots of doing before we question how we think, as in metacognition. For example, how did Singapore become more competitive than the US? And now Vietnam is poised to overtake even Singapore. 

Recall how people move up in human development. It takes experience, and that’s what rapid economic growth gave the Singaporeans and now the Vietnamese. Because of the experience, they moved up beyond dualism or absolutism and into relativism.

For example, beyond “analysis” is “analytics,” and the latter presupposes forward-thinking and dynamism. Yet, it is not about one’s IQ or string of degrees but experience. Consider: Back in 2014, indeed, we saw an uptick in manufacturing. But that was driven by local consumption and the global supply chain (GSC.) 

And because of our inward-looking bias – and failure to forward-think – we didn’t recognize that more impoverished Vietnam borrowed from the playbook of the Asian Tigers. And they then shamed our export performance and poverty rate.

Then consider: Why did we even kick out the US military? Yet, today, three wealthy nations keep them – massively. They are Japan, Germany, and South Korea. These people are miles ahead of us in development. Unsurprisingly, they also understand the universal law of “divine” oneness.

This universe we live in isn’t for aristocracies. It is a 24/7, dynamic phenomenon. And it goes back to the story of Eden – and when humankind saw the need to migrate from Africa. 

Why are we out-of-step with reality?

Recall our instincts: We are parochial and insular. We value hierarchy and paternalism that we rely on political patronage and oligarchy that ours is a culture of impunity.

The evidence? From a failed war on drugs, we’re now into the war on terrorism? What about the longest failed war, the war on poverty?

What are the disciples of the status quo saying? That there is a conspiracy to undo the greatness of Marcos? God bless this country!

Let’s pause and again take a third-party example so that we are not jaded.

And this comes from a bona fide conservative, Peter WehnerPeter Wehner (@Peter_Wehner) is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, served in the previous three Republican administrations, a visiting professor at Duke, and the author of “The Death of Politics: How to Heal Our Frayed Republic After Trump.”

“The reasons the Republican base has shown such fidelity to Mr. Trump are multilayered. Many support his policy agenda and have a near-existential fear of what an ascent to power by a Democratic president would mean.

“Among Mr. Trump’s supporters, there is not just dislike but detestation for the left (and progressives reciprocate those feelings). Resentments and grievances over being the object of the left’s contempt have built up for years.

“The president’s supporters view him not just as their defender; they see him as their avenging angel. And on top of all that is the acute political polarization that characterizes this era. Those with a tribalistic mindset believe that refusing to support a Republican president is traitorous. So, they have stayed loyal to the president. That is through all the carnage, all the lies, all the appeals to our ugliest impulses.

“During the Trump presidency, Republican lawmakers who know better have been putting up propaganda signs in their storehouse windows in the name of party loyalty and self-aggrandizement. The price they would pay for honesty would be much lower than that of the citizen of a totalitarian regime. It’s not too late to take the signs down, break the rules of the game, and rediscover their suppressed identity and dignity.

“In his extraordinary 1978 essay ‘The Power of the Powerless,’ which comes up with some frequency during the Trump administration, the Czech dissident (and later president) Vaclav Havel famously refers to a greengrocer who puts in his shop window a Marxist slogan — ‘Workers of the world, unite!’

“The greengrocer doesn’t believe in the slogan, or the regime, built on lies. But he acts as he does, or at least abides the lies in silence. According to Havel, he doesn’t have to accept the lie; he merely needs to live within it. But what happens, Havel asked, if one day the greengrocer, among other things, stops putting up slogans merely to ingratiate himself?

“The president’s brazen assaults on truth were jolting at first. Today, however, we have grown accustomed to them — and to the fact that Republican officeholders have almost without exception stood behind him during the last three-and-a-half years.

“They calculated that giving voice to their consciences was not worth incurring the Republican base’s wrath. It was more comfortable, less wearying, and a lot less of a hassle to fall behind Mr. Trump. In one sense, of course, they were right. But doing so comes at a price.

“The president brings his degradation of the truth to new lengths, but the basic project has been the same.

“No president in the history of our Republic has been as disorienting as Donald Trump. His goal, even before he became president, was far more ambitious than to tell mere lies. It was to annihilate the distinction between truth and falsity, to make sure that we no longer share facts in common, to overwhelm people with misinformation and disinformation. It was to induce epistemological vertigo on a mass scale.

“Plato asks, ‘Will he not fancy that the shadows which he formerly saw are truer than the objects which are now shown to him?’ Donald Trump’s supporters have been looking only at phantoms.” [Trump Has Made Alternative Facts a Way of Life, Peter Wehner, The New York Times, 13th Jun 2020]

Recall that the blog has compared Juan de la Cruz with Trump. Why? Because we both live in the past.

He thinks he can declare bankruptcy six times and still come out the winner. He lies as he sees fit and always comes out the winner.

We think we can abuse Juan de la Cruz, the overseas Filipino worker, and still come out the winner.

There is no free lunch.

Even the wealthiest country, the United States, knows that now. For example, the 2008 Global Recession’s greed continues to haunt them – and exposed by COVID-19. American exceptionalism is riding on the almighty dollar. And as history tells us, empires come and go.

For example, given we are now a multi-polar world, they can’t afford a double whammy in the person of Trump. Hubris will sink them deeper. We can see it with our eyes, Xi and Duterte engaged in a lovefest. And Putin and his former KGB friends trolling to influence the US elections once again. As if that’s not enough, Trump wants Xi too to get China to sway his reelection. Lock him up!

Still, autocracy and tyranny aren’t the ones in sync with the dynamism of the universe, but transparency, and oneness in the rule of law.

Unsurprisingly, within the Republic Party, there are several groups pouring money in this election season. Trump, who likes watching Fox TV, can’t hide his scorn to see political ads targeted against him paid for by people from his party. And the more he insults them, the more contributions they get – to pay for these ads for longer than they had planned.

But what about Juan de la Cruz? Let’s do a shortlist, and there he is: (1) Our caste system; (2) The hubris that comes with it – aka entitlement, as opposed to personal responsibility; (3) Our culture of impunity, which comes from our caste system.

Gising bayan!


“But the fault was chiefly their own. Filipinos profess the love of country, but love themselves – individually – more.” [Ninoy Aquino, Foreign Affairs magazine, July 1968; Stanley Karnow, New York Times Magazine, “Cory Aquino’s Downhill Slide,” 19th Aug 1990.]

“Why independence, if the slaves of today will be the tyrants of tomorrow? Moreover, that they will be such is not to be doubted, for he who submits to tyranny loves it.” [We are ruled by Rizal’s ‘tyrants of tomorrow,’ Editorial, The Manila Times, 29th Dec 2015]

“True social reform has little to do with politics. To unmoor ourselves from the burdens of the past, we must be engaged in the act of continual and conscious self-renewal. All men are partially buried in the grave of custom. Even virtue is no longer such if it is stagnant.

“Change begins when we finally choose to examine critically and then recalibrate the ill-serving codes and conventions handed down to us, often unquestioned, by the past and its power structures. It is essentially an act of imagination first.” [David Henry Thoreau; American essayist, poet, and philosopher; 1817-1862]

“National prosperity is created, not inherited. It does not grow out of a country’s natural endowments, its labor pool, its interest rates, or its currency’s value, as classical economics insists. [A] nation’s competitiveness depends on the capacity of its industry to innovate and upgrade.” [The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Michael E. Porter, Harvard Business Review, March–April 1990]

“You have to have a dream, whether big or small. Then plan, focus, work hard, and be very determined to achieve your goals.” [Henry Sy Sr., Chairman Emeritus and Founder, SM Group (1924 - 2019)]

“Learning and innovation go hand in hand. The arrogance of success is to think that what you did yesterday will be sufficient for tomorrow.” [William Pollard, 1911-1989, physicist-priest, Manhattan Project]

“Development is informed by a people’s worldview, cognitive capacity, values, moral development, self-identity, spirituality, and leadership . . .” [Frederic Laloux, Reinventing organizations, Nelson Parker, 2014]

Now I know why Paul dared to speak of ‘the curse of the law’ (Galatians 3:13). Law reigns and discernment is unnecessary, which means there is little growth or change in such people. When you do not grow, you remain an infant.” [Faith and Science, Open to Change, Richard Rohr’s Daily Meditation, 23rd Oct 2017]

“As a major component for the education and reorientation of our people, mainstream media – their reporters, writers, photographers, columnists, and editors – have an obligation to this country . . .” [Era of documented irrelevance: Mainstream media, critics and protesters, Homobono A. Adaza, The Manila Times, 25th Nov 2015]