We are an economic
laggard for a reason? Just prior to this year's ADB meeting we geared
up to impress the delegations that we have a few tricks up our
sleeves that they would want to replicate. For example, our banking
reforms are a model. (And in fairness, the international media
picked up and highlighted positive developments like Philippine
leadership in the call-center business.) But wait a minute wasn't
the home of a banker recently attacked resulting in the death of
those in his security detail? (And we're not the Wild West!)
And just days ago the writer received an email from a relative who
was devastated by a run in a Philippine bank! Then by chance he
watched on CNN the CEO of the oldest Philippine conglomerate waxing
poetic about how they have consistently worked in support of
government agenda. But given that we are an economic laggard where is
the economic mismanagement of the country coming from? (And also on
CNN they had a presentation – “Real junk food in the Philippines”
– explaining how restaurant trash is recycled into food in a shanty
town.)
The reality is we are all
contributing to this economic mismanagement when we ‘see no
evil, hear no evil and speak no evil.’ Or when we wash our
hands and claim it is the government or the leadership or some
extraneous force that is responsible. What we instead want to do is
do our part? For instance, it is encouraging that the DOTC and the
DOT folks are working together to make tourist attractions accessible
with proper infrastructure. And the DTI is working with industries to
develop their respective road maps in order to raise our
competitiveness. The challenge with road maps though is their
execution. For example, the Agriculture department crafted a road map
that would make our fishing industry a major international player.
But where are we now given recent news reports that we may have
largely depleted our aquatic resources? What about our energy game
plan? It is not enough to produce a plan, not even an outstanding
one, because it has zero value if it is not executed!
We are playing catch up
in a world that is progressing at warp speed and given we are behind
even with the fundamental building blocks of an economy, we better
not take things sitting down? And that means aside from execution
there must be constancy in problem-solving. Beneath the "cockiness"
Europeans see in Americans is the intensity and constancy in
problem-solving – with the exception, of course, of Washington.
[The culture shock the writer experienced upon moving to the
company headquarters in New York is the problem-solving culture that
was pervasive; which he has passed on to his Eastern European friends
and, of course, the bias for execution.] And the net effect is
seen in how they differed in dealing with the Great Recession –
i.e. while neither was perfect the outcomes reveal who has gained
grounds.
Execution and
problem-solving are the unseen qualities behind competitiveness. For
example, Singapore's competitive strength is enviable with clarity
and confidence in their undertakings feeding each other, producing a
virtuous circle. Of course, our own half a dozen dominant enterprises
can claim the same capability – but with one exception. They are
truly ratcheting up their oligarchic control on the Philippine
economy – absent the imperative to raise Philippine
competitiveness. Singapore, in contrast, is raising the
competitiveness of their industry and the nation as a whole. And so
in October they are hosting a global conference (for an industry) and
a major highlight is to showcase their R&D prowess. Yet this
city-state, as a republic, started from scratch only a year before
the ADB was established in Manila.
It is that distinction
that will confine us to economic laggards for as long as we are
unable to internalize what an interconnected and a highly competitive
world is about – i.e., it is tapping and optimizing the dynamic of
investment and technology thus creating a culture of innovation,
nurtured by a commitment to talent, product and market development.
Simply, the 21st century demands the right, wider and borderless
participation in the economy – not the parochial, narrow, limited
and exclusive character of our cacique culture where oligarchy and
poverty are two sides of the same coin. The good news is “one of
the big boys,” Ambassador Manuel M. Lopez, is on a mission: “to
make great strides in attracting foreign capital that can help lift
the country’s economic stature,” reports Manila Bulletin,
30th April 2012.
What can a single Juan dela Cruz do to help our economy.
ReplyDelete