If
we have one wish for Juan de la Cruz, it is change. One recent Sunday
my wife and I attended the noon mass at the Cathedral of St. Joseph
in Sofia, Bulgaria. We had few options after missing the English
mass, and knew it would be in Latin. While we admired the recently
reconstructed church (a casualty of WW II), we knew it would be a
struggle to follow the celebration despite our subconscious putting a
sprinkling of Latin words in our mouth from those pre-Vatican II
days. And on the flight back to New York I happened to read an
article about the growing number of churches reverting back to Latin.
Didn't we say it was a dead language? But the article tried to
provoke: Are Catholics recognizing that Vatican II was a catastrophic
mistake?
Indeed
the human instinct is resistant to change. Even globally competitive
enterprises invested in "managing change" have realized
that change, including those from bad to good, brought upheaval. And
it holds true in the Vatican as well – where among the cardinals
there is dissension too. The debate goes: if the church is committed
to engage the "People of God," it ought to keep them truly
engaged? How could one ignorant of the language be engaged in the
mass, for example, even when the Eucharistic celebration is central
to our faith? Blind obedience nurtures subservience, not faith – or
character? Moreover, faith and institution are not one and the same?
Which explains why despite errant church administrators the faithful
remain faithful? Yet there remains a discomfort about change given
the changes Vatican II has brought about that many are fearful of?
And which is why the curia struggles to address change?
And
similarly, the upheaval that accompanies change explains why we
struggle to address change even when we acknowledge that we must –
or why CCT is such an important piece of the national budget, for
instance? And so we want to raise our competitiveness to give us a
shot at lifting our economy? And indeed we're doing it in a prudent
manner; yet it hasn't spared us of being witness to the ups and downs
of our periodic rankings. And thoroughly addressing the individual
yardsticks makes sense except that while we are going through our own
exercises, other countries are not asleep.
How
do we leapfrog our efforts? There must be a bigger or overarching
value that we must aspire for not simply to raise our ratings in the
various measures? What is the object of the exercise? Economic
development is meant to move underdeveloped nations to
developed-nation status. Clearly, there is a great distance between
the two – and in our case that is at least a generation growing at
a constant 7% annually – and thus there is a great chance of being
lost along the way. Development like any undertaking demands
investment. It is a journey that calls for time, talent and treasure
as we know it in our faith journey. But what has been getting in our
way?
Oligarchy
and political lords both nationally and locally dominate our power
structure and given our respect for hierarchy, we unwittingly are
aiding and abetting the perpetuation of this sad reality? And have we
misunderstood what “inclusive” meant? It is not synonymous to
“crab mentality” or we shall keep repeating failings like land
reform – which was bound to fail because it was not designed to be
sustainable. Land as a resource must generate returns that are
healthy in order to create a virtuous circle. It means, beyond
distributing land, creating the requisite ecosystem. It is the lesson
we learned from the “Parable of the Talents” – i.e.,
optimizing the returns from our God-given talents and resources means
not being confined by boundaries, parochial or whatever else. And the
converse, unfortunately, is oligarchic rule. And have we also
misunderstood patriotism? Haven't the vulnerabilities inherent in
poverty (while we've trampled on the environment) in fact exposed us
to more and greater risks?
These
are indeed great obstacles yet we have the God-given human spirit to
rise above them. The challenge is for Juan de la Cruz to respond
accordingly. And thus our wish is change and . . . a blessed
Christmas and New Year to one and all!
No comments:
Post a Comment