It
is not self-flagellation that we need but what about an
honest-to-goodness "examination of conscience” – if we are
to turn over a new leaf? But aren't we being Christian-like precisely
when we aspire to be "inclusive"? Whether it was the
Baltimore Catechism or our prayer group that started us in our faith
journey, it is common knowledge that even the Creator had to
prioritize? And "to prioritize" is something we take for
granted and consequently, "to focus" is missing likewise?
We
joke about it but if we pause for a moment to figure out why economic
development-wise we lag at least a generation, we may want to ask
ourselves if "crab mentality" will help explain why we
can't build and operate an international airport, for example, when
practically every other nation has done it. And if we add our energy
conundrum and how much we have outgrown our infrastructure in general
and thus putting a strain on the environment and, not surprisingly,
the elevated incidence of respiratory-related diseases, among others,
the picture isn’t pretty.
And
“pwede na ‘yan” isn’t the answer given that these are
not brand new but rather an accumulation of shortcomings – and a
manifestation of a structural weakness – and not surprisingly would
require at least a generation to tackle? And that assumes we shall
grow the economy at a consistent 7% annually. And as a senator
reminded us, the question is, can we sustain it? We may be
celebrating the recent fate of the BRIC countries (once favored by
Wall Street) yet what goes around comes around. And precisely, these
countries have had their own structural shortfalls that made those
rosy predictions come to naught.
A
recent Harvard Business Review article (Accelerate, John P.
Kotter, Nov 2012) presents a model on how enterprises can cope in
today's dynamic world and thus be on their feet. Yet to globally
competitive companies the model is not new because it is simply
fundamental. But what higher learning does is translate real-world
solutions into a body of knowledge and present it as a model.
Kotter
spells out the challenge of an enterprise as follows: “Perhaps
the greatest challenge business leaders face today is how to stay
competitive amid constant turbulence and disruption." And he
calls his model the “Eight Accelerators”: (1) Create a sense
of urgency around a single big opportunity; (2) Build and maintain a
guiding coalition: (3) Formulate a strategic vision and develop
change initiatives designed to capitalize on the big opportunity; (4)
Communicate the vision and the strategy to create buy-in and attract
a growing volunteer army; (5) Accelerate movement toward the vision
and the opportunity by ensuring that the network removes barriers;
(6) Celebrate visible, significant short-term wins; (7) Never let up.
Keep learning from experience. Don’t declare victory too soon; (8)
Institutionalize strategic changes in the culture.”
Not
surprisingly, for example, Clinton translated his "It's the
economy, stupid" into the "single big opportunity" of
balancing the budget – because it’s simply fundamental? But we
Pinoys struggle to prioritize and thus are unable to internalize the
Pareto principle or the 80-20 rule? How can we focus on what matters
and will give us the big and quick wins if to be “inclusive” is
our overarching value – and unwittingly fall prey to crab
mentality?
There
is a "black hole" between plans that read right on paper
and plans that are successfully executed that enterprises learn about
from experience – i.e., "portfolio management" is a
given. Every time there are a number of initiatives in a plan the
80-20 rule will most likely emerge. We need more than a New Year's
resolution, we need to break the cycle – i.e., haven't we written
great economic plans over the last 65 years or so?
And
that is the New Year's wish we want to share with Juan de la Cruz.
No comments:
Post a Comment