As the Aquino
administration marches forward it is being confronted with the law of
averages. And as media reports on its play-by-play performance we see
reality playing itself out. For instance, while missions to the
Philippines by potential foreign investors are on the rise as well as
our trade missions to other countries, pundits have asked: “Show
us the money?” Indeed we must get our fair share of foreign
investments and revenues. It's a New Year and we all want our
favorite initiatives, yet the administration ought to focus and
prioritize.
It
can't overnight erase the restrictive economic provisions in our
constitution nor the culture of corruption that President Aquino has
waged war on. Still, there is the imperative to raise the bar –
investors don’t give currency to “pwede na ‘yan”? Our
energy master plan remains a work in progress because Juan de la Cruz
hasn’t demanded a concrete coherent solution even after legislators
revealed that vested interests have been defending the status quo.
And so instead of a “dynamic PHL” we’ve remained the
“status quo PHL”? And sadly while it has undermined the
economy hand-in-hand with Juan de la Cruz, the industry is in
celebratory mode; and to add insult to injury, key players are
lionized thus perpetuating local lords? The PPP remains closer to a
game plan and is yet to get into the rhythm of things. The road map
for agri-business (including fisheries) is still a road map. And
while it appears we now want to focus on four major industry groups
in 2013 to appreciably raise economic output, the prognosis remains
at the level of export targets and GDP projections that will result
from numerous elements and initiatives. What is missing – or
probably not reported as news? Who will do what, when, where and how?
How
much investment are these industries committed to? What technologies
will they acquire and where, and what innovations will they pursue?
How much employment will they generate and what skill-sets will
people learn? What new markets will these industries develop, what
are their sizes and how much share do we realistically expect to
take? How does that translate to incremental economic output over
what period? The Department of Trade and Industries and the JFC
(Joint Foreign Chambers) have rightly set a goal of over $100
billion, and that should bring us closer to a Thailand. But that will
remain just a goal until we respond to the foregoing challenges. Our
local market may be big but 100 million Pinoys after discounting
our income and poverty levels don't represent the true market.
We
have to seriously revisit our assumption that a big local population
is sufficient to raise our economic output several times fold – and
which we've euphemistically labeled “consumption economy”? That
comfort zone is undermining our instincts of innovation especially
when the local market has been characterized as “pwede na ‘yan.”
Instead we ought to demonstrate Pinoy creativity and step up
to global competition. It will take a different worldview if we are
to gain that confidence but we won’t . . . if we don’t commit to
investment accordingly, especially in technology and innovation.
Isn't
Juan de la Cruz predisposed to investment and which is why the
Chinoys have become the pillar of our economy? Our bias can't
stay with rent-seeking that would characterize the handful of
conglomerates that dominate our economy? Whether it is retail or
housing or even services geared for the local market, our economic
pie shall remain small relative to our population until we inject a
new dynamic.
Of
course we must feel positive that we grew at over 7%, but that was
from a low base and a low GDP per capita. We don’t want to be
lulled by the law of averages, we must confront it instead. Our major
enterprises, successful as they are, are still driven by OFW
remittances and of late by the BPO industry, enough for analysts to
make bullish projections. Yet our economic pie remains small; and so
we have to resort to CCT and CSR, for example. Indeed we must raise
the bar. But first things first: focus and prioritize.
No comments:
Post a Comment