“While government
walks the delicate line between the affordable and the necessary as
far as energy sources are concerned, still it could look just a
little farther out of the box and anticipate an energy future that is
truly self-sufficient, clean, and renewable.” [Former Senator
Atty. Joey D. Lina Jr., Manila Bulletin, 19th Mar 2013] This is the
kind of challenge that demands more than incremental thinking – we
need our version of the “Manhattan Project”?
Back
in Eastern Europe after my annual extended yearend-break, my friends,
unmistakably, have their eye trained on the future, more than ever.
And so the excitement was palpable as we ratcheted up product
development and innovation efforts – to aggressively compete
especially in the developed markets of Asia and the West. They’ve
finally gotten over the blinders that they could only sell
consumer-packaged goods at 50 euro cents – “because we’re
poor Bulgarians” – and are instead giving their creativity
free-rein. And it didn't feel that I had gone on holiday since I
travelled with them around Asia. [When I first came to Eastern Europe
one question they kept asking is: “Does the free market have its
rules?” I emphasized transparency. That competition
ought to be fair and square. That those who couldn't compete under
those conditions and would game the system instead would mirror the
unfairness they experienced under their communist rulers. And when
the Great Recession came about, they realized what that meant –
that greed as in unbridled capitalism can undermine a system that is
meant to be egalitarian. Thus the rule of law must indeed be inherent
– and the US legislators that have been keeping the heat on Wall
Street are to be applauded.]
While
traveling around Asia one evening, we were taking in as much of the
skyline of Singapore from the Sands SkyPark over cocktails when my
Eastern European friends asked how much Singapore had changed. And a
New Yorker overheard us and introduced himself: "I am a PhD
student at the National University and next to me is my professor."
The West has been critical of Singapore's highly centralized form
of government, yet lately there has been a softening (as this young
New Yorker demonstrated in opting to pursue his graduate work in this
city-state) with more and more Western firms choosing to set up shop
in Singapore over Hong Kong especially after the latter reverted from
British to Chinese rule.
And
very recently on Al Jazeera TV they featured the ongoing protest in
Singapore, against the plan to increase the population by 30%, and
thus immigration, being an economic imperative. And much of the
objection had to do with the expected strain on the infrastructure.
And so the government has been explaining that, as history would bear
out, they'd always factored infrastructure development in their
forward-thinking and planning process. But then again, perfection is
not of this world; foreigners may be in awe of Singapore’s
infrastructure but it doesn’t mean that the locals are.
The
College of Cardinals elected a Jesuit in Pope Francis, and since we
Pinoys appear to mirror the church – especially its hierarchical
orientation – the hope is finally we would be less so? And
especially after Francis shunned his Vatican-provided car for a
minibus and joined the rest of the cardinals, for instance? We don't
have to be banished like the Jesuits once were – just to recognize
that rewarding hierarchy, oligopoly and political dynasties
undermines the common good?
Of
course, we need leadership and imagination too?
No comments:
Post a Comment