“A
group of real estate brokers, subdivision and socialized housing
developers called on the Senate to stop the passage of the proposed
National Land Use Act outlining new policies on land use and
development.” [Manila Standard Today, 12th Feb 2013] And writes
former Senator Atty. Rene Espina, Manila Bulletin, 11th Feb 2013: “.
. . based on historical records . . . many of our appointed officials
who were supposed to plan out and expedite the reconstruction of a
new City of Cebu and Manila [after the US Armed Forces defeated the
Japanese Imperial Army in our country] by approving a new city plan
became instead the leaders of the status quo
[underscored]. This was true of what was then the Cebu City Planning
Board. Some of its members were real estate owners. Thus when there
was an attempt to build new modern roads that went through the
demolished burned buildings, the city planning board would object to
its implementation. Indeed we lost a golden opportunity to have roads
that would be better suited to handle the traffic of the future.”
The
gap of almost 70 years between these two events didn't matter. The
human condition still sought to prevail. And it appears we are big
fans of "the status quo”! And we are unmistakably
paying the price, like it or not. We want to be the next Asian tiger?
But are we prepared to unequivocally challenge the status quo, for
instance? Do we know where we want to be and commit to pursue the
common good? We kick and scream about the absence of "inclusive
growth" yet we all feel like privileged? It is either below our
rank or we are poor Juan de la Cruz and deserve compassion? To our
horror we have been witness to silent anarchy but anarchy nonetheless
because we have ignored the rule of law? Yet we remain proud of our
faith but which is why a Jesuit friend would simply ask: "Is it
"plastic"?
"It's
more fun in the Philippines" was how a friend tried to liven
up the predicament we were in: driving along SLEX from Alabang on our
way to Greenhills to respond to a mutual friend's dinner invitation
on a Friday evening, we kept driving along South Expressway as heavy
traffic prevented us from making a right turn until we found
ourselves closer to Santa Mesa then Broadway and from there took
Ortigas. People probably don't notice it anymore, particularly
property developers, but "density" is the word – and it
would apply to Baguio too where we visited a couple of weeks earlier
or to other metro areas elsewhere in the country. (And no wonder
respiratory ailments are on the rise.) And the following Tuesday, as
luck would have it, traffic on C-5 turned it into a virtual parking
lot that we missed a 6 PM appointment. And driving from Bonifacio
Global City one morning and again one evening towards Ayala Avenue
would indeed confirm that "It's more fun in the Philippines."
As
my friend would recall, it's not only us in Metro Manila that are
paying the price, people in Compostela paid a heavier price. They had
visited twice as a group to provide medical and other assistance to
families who were still housed in temporary facilities – and in
some cases had family members perished in a recent storm ("Pablo".)
Their group (that included rescue teams from Malaysia) would lament
that Manila seemed to have forgotten about Compostela – as they
themselves experienced heavy rains, and flooding, when they were
there. And then we read real estate folks are again defending the
status quo, fighting land-use legislation! When will we recognize
that the 21st century demands dynamism, not status quo?
In
the meantime we expect to be the next Asian tiger? There is no free
lunch! Yet free enterprise doesn't mean free-rein as the world
witnessed how Western greed (which coincidentally went manifest in
the housing-credit bubble) brought about the Great Recession. But can
we declare ourselves pure especially given our disregard of the
environment – while at the same time failing in our fundamental
responsibility of nation-building . . . of the common good? Are we
doomed? Until we realize that there is no one to pass the buck to . .
. except to our children and our children’s children?
No comments:
Post a Comment